• February 22nd, 2012SproutmanNews

    By Mark Bittman, Feb. 13, 2012, New York Times

    There are more than a few improvements McDonald’s could make to better the treatment of its customers and workers, of the animals that provide the meat it sells and of the environment. On Monday, after years of internal and external pressure, the company announced a laudable course of action regarding the sows (female pigs) in their supply chain: McDonald’s is requiring, by May, that its suppliers of pork  provide plans for phasing out gestation crates.

    Once those plans are delivered, says Bob Langert, the company’s vice president of sustainability, McDonald’s will create a timetable to end the use of gestation crates in its supply chain. “Considering that 90 percent [of the pregnant sows] in the United States are in gestation stalls, this is a huge issue,” he says, and he’s right.Pigs in Crates. McDonalds does the right thing

    This is important for the animals and for the entire meat-selling industry. Let’s start with the sows: a gestation crate is an individual metal stall so small that the sow cannot turn around; most sows spend not only their pregnancies in crates, but most of their lives. For humans, this would qualify as “cruel and unusual punishment,” and even if you believe that pigs are somehow “inferior,” it’s hard to rationalize gestation crates once you see what they look like. (For the record, defenders of the system suggest that crates prevent sows from fighting in group pens. There’s no space to argue that here, but it’s nonsense.)

    Read the rest of this column here.

    Check Out These Specials From Sproutman!

Leave a reply

Site text & trademark images Copyright 2013 Sproutman Publications Inc., Steve Meyerowitz, Sproutman.
PO Box 180, 413 Farm Road, Summertown, TN 38483
Phone: 1 800 695-2241 - 12pm to 3pm EST
Site developed by • HG